Criteria

Points

1

2

3

4

Poster Drawing with Stats

Poster contains a sloppy drawing of landmark. Stats/facts are illegible. Poster may lack color. Poster has a very poor level of quality.

Poster contains a poor drawing of landmark. A few stats/facts are labeled on poster. Poster may lack color or neatness. Poster has a poor level of quality.

Poster has an adequate drawing of landmark. Some stats/facts are labeled on poster. Poster has color. Poster needs some improvement to reach a higher level of quality.

Poster contains a neat drawing of landmark. Many stats/facts are labeled neatly on poster. Poster is colorful and has a high degree of quality.

____

Landmark: Originality and construction

There were no original ideas expressed in this landmark. Construction of landmark is of poor quality.

The ideas expressed by the landmark demonstrate a low degree of originality. Construction of landmark lacks some quality.

The ideas expressed by the landmark are mostly original. The group may have improved upon construction of the landmark.

The ideas expressed by the landmark demonstrate a high degree of originality. Construction of landmark is of a high quality.

____

Brochure

Brochure had major errors in grammar or spelling. Brochure has sloppy appearance.

Brochure had 3-5 errors in grammar or spelling. Little effort was given for neatness.

Brochure had 1 error related to either grammar or spelling. Some effort was given for neatness.

Brochure was free of errors related to either grammar or spelling. Brochure has a high quality of neatness.

____

Cooperation between partners

The final products are not the result of a collaborative effort. The group showed no evidence of collaboration.

The team had problems working together. Little collaboration occurred.

The team worked well together, but could have utilized each other's skills to a better degree.

It is evident that a mutual effort and cohesive unit created the final products.

____

____

Total---->

____